Arno Stark isn't quite the hero his cousin Tony Stark was, but he does his best - as long as the best is what pays. The world of 2020 is less about right and wrong, and more about the bottom line which is why IRON MAN always works for the highest bidder. Of course, he's also got to answer to his Board, so he tries to keep his eye on the big picture. If a mission won't enhance Stark Industries' stock price, then he almost always regretfully declines.
Today I'm taking a look at - in case you haven't already guessed - Iron Man 2020.
Packaging
Iron Man 2020
''It's the same basic figure as the previously released ''Golden Avenger'' Iron Man, just with some new pieces!''
Erm, thanks. I'd never have noticed that. Anyway, let's start by examining these extra pieces in more detail.
Firstly, there's a new head-sculpt. Although it shares some common traits with the classic Iron Man armours, the eye-slots are slightly larger and have an ''angry'' angle to them. Similarly, the mouth, rather than being a simple slot, is a crenellated shape, almost giving the impression of teeth. Sadly on my figure it's difficult to see this due to the combination of a weak cast and poorly-applied paint.
One other major difference between Iron Man 2020's armour and that of the original is that the ''widow's peak'' on the helmet is more akin to the modern suits, where it forms a squarer-peak rather than an actual point.
You see, all the new parts lack definition. The weapons are molded onto his belt (and appear so), the buckle is like melted-wax and the mask's ''teeth'' are only visible under close scrutiny.
The paint-job is a nice concept, but the execution isn't up to standard. The bronzed-look is nice, as it makes him appear more metallic than the other Iron Men in my collection. However, his face is very poorly painted (and again, this could be my figure alone), with his mouth being a dark splodge and his right-hand side lacking the crisp application present on the left.
Extras
Iron Man 2020 includes a yellow Repulsor-blast that clips onto his wrist (without any real problems, it just doesn't look very convincing), his own custom stand (which he fits perfectly, unlike the Series 3 toys) and a HAMMER file.
Final Thoughts
Iron Man 2020 is its own worst enemy. The problem is that when you first look at it, it's actually pretty eye-catching. You can see it's not a ''regular'' Iron Man and, as such, it warrants more attention. But as soon as you begin looking at the toy, you notice the problems: the injection-mold marks, the poor paint-job, the mis-aligned joints and gouges and the custom-pieces - which should have been the highlight of the figure - simply don't hold-up to close scrutiny.I know Hasbro released this figure because it was a cheap way to produce another toy, given that at its core it's simply the Iron Man Golden Avenger, dolled-up. But that doesn't explain why the finish and overall quality of the toy - and I'm not just limiting this to the new pieces - is so poor.
Unless you're a die-hard Iron Man 2020 fan (and I'm sure there must be some, somewhere) or a completist, give this toy a miss.
Scores
Sculpt | B |
Paint | B |
Articulation | B+ |
Production Quality | D |
Final Score | C |
Image Gallery
Wow, that was a pretty brutal review... lol
ReplyDeleteI hate being negative and maybe it's just my figure, but when I looked at it, all I saw was how shoddily-produced a toy this is: there are chunks missing from his limbs, injection-mold marks everywhere, the new pieces (especially the belt) are very badly cast and there's even a crack in his torso!
ReplyDeleteThe toy is simply produced to an inferior - and in my view, unacceptable - quality.
Here's hoping the rest of the wave are better!
Sounds like you picked a bad one. Sorry.
ReplyDeleteDo you think all of these Ironman 2020 figures are like this or did you just happen to get a hold of a bad one maybe?
ReplyDeleteI always try to point out my reviews are subjective, based on the toy(s) I have at hand. Soundwave810 reviewed the figure and his seems fine. I've seen reviews that have mentioned bad joints and the poorly-produced accessories and some that have praised the high quality(!) of the figure's production.
ReplyDeleteOne blemish on the figure's cast, I could write-off as being a limited production problem. But virtually every piece of my Iron Man 2020 has either a gouge out of it, a cast-line or an injection-mold spot.
I hate being negative but both the Iron Man 2020 and Spider-Man 2099 figures I've reviewed have been a real backward step for Hasbro in terms of design, quality and execution. I'm hoping I get some good toys for Christmas so I can get back to writing positive reviews!
I guess these things happen in the production process and i would rather read a honest review on something i might want to buy. Merry Christmas my friend and am looking forward to more reviews soon.
ReplyDeleteYeah, as I say, I simply speak as I find and if it's a dodgy figure, I can't do anything but tell you that!
ReplyDeleteAnd you have a good one too! I know I've a few things coming from Santa that will certainly be featured soon!
Maybe things would have been different if they used the Iron Man 2 Iron Man.
ReplyDeletePossibly. The figure just feels cheap in the same way I thought Spider-Man 2099 did - not just in the poor casting but the whole feel. A different grade of plastic, maybe?
ReplyDeleteI understand the points in your review, but kudos for coming up with such great poses! That's something I'm really unimaginative about. I liked what you did!
ReplyDeleteAndy
Thanks. I always try to provide a 'static' shot of front, side and rear and then work in a few dynamic poses. Joint-wise there weren't really any problems with Iron Man 2020, so it made posing pretty easy. It's just the finish and quality on the figure that really lets it down.
ReplyDelete